Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Back to First Principles in Edinburgh

Our Edinburgh Correspondent returns with an Edinburgh update, suggesting there will be further changes. Omnibuses welcomes contributions

Back in March, this correspondent reported on the competition between First and Lothian in the Edinburgh area of Scotland; only having to rush out an update a few days later when First announced it was closing one-and-a-half garages. This has now happened, so now seems a good point to reflect on how things turned out.

The Dalkeith garage has now closed. Some town services are now being provided by Lothian Buses, as well as the route from Penicuik to Musselburgh. It will be interesting to see how these services develop, to see whether Lothian’s apparent magic touch will turn these around.

Lothian rejigged its 3 and 33 routes to Edinburgh to compensate for the loss of the first trunk route 86. Interestingly, although there were some extensions to the 33, the 3 was cut back and there were no frequency increases, though the 33 does go up to every 10 minutes at peak times but split over two branches. Whenever I saw an old First 86 at peak time, it did have a reasonable load (though not standing room only) so Lothian hopefully has their loading calculations right here.

Musselburgh garage has now been downsized and only two First services go to the city centre from the east. Many of the country services went to independents such as Eve’s Coaches, or Edinburgh Coach Lines. But Lothian formed a new subsidiary East Lothian Buses to take over the service to Pencaitland, resurrecting the old Eastern Scottish route number 113. The 113 is currently operated with plain white Trident double decks, albeit with green advertising panels about the service. East Lothian Buses fleet names are carried and it is rumoured that five new single decks have been ordered for the service—they may carry more green. The reason for the new identity is that the 113 does not have the £1.40 flat fare seen in the rest of the network but a three zone structure: two zones are still £1.40. The route is extended westwards from the city centre to the western general Hospital, providing a really useful new link, as well as saving difficult layover arrangements in the tram-worked city centre. Apparently, some peak hour buses have been seen with standing room only so hopefully (again) the single deck loading calculations are right.

Elsewhere, Lothian has some interesting changes. The 44 (to my surprise) that had 12 buses an hour from both First and Lothian now has only six buses (albeit with a new eastern branch): Lothian has left its frequency at every 10 minutes. But some other routes did get increases: both the 5 and 35 from every 15 to 12 minutes. The 5 does shadow the 44 (and the old 86) for part of the way so that it’s a sensible inner city strengthening. The 35 doesn’t, so it is difficult to see how it helps with the displaced demand from First: maybe the loadings simply justified it. And after remarking in the first article how services to Penicuik had not suffered from the First withdrawal, well blow me if these routes have not lost one bus an hour on weekday mornings.

First did not make a glorious exit. In the last days of Dalkeith being open, the depot was short of drivers and/or vehicles and—the ignominy of it all—had to hire in both from Lothian to keep some services running for a week or two. Apparently, a lot of buses went for scrap, but some have been redeployed elsewhere in Scotland. And its website had a page announcing "First Services from 10 June" but was blank: maybe that was someone making some existentialist comment on all of this. Although updated, the page today still reads "SERVICE CHANGES FROM THE 30 JUNE 2012: this will be the last date of operation for the following services...” with nothing to follow. At the time of writing, the network map has yet to be updated, adding to the confusion of what they do or will provide.

So is the First operation in East Scotland now safe? Time will tell. Rumours abound that the remaining staff at Musselburgh and North Berwick depots have been put on 90-day notice. Certainly the operations left are not where First likes to play, being predominately rural. And a road trip that passed near Stirling saw some First vehicles even older than we had seen in Edinburgh of late (N reg). Again, rumours of another major group buying First out in this West area… but why they might do that is not immediately obvious.

I rather fear that the First East Scotland saga is not over yet.

22 comments:

Pete said...

Excellent summary.

The 113 is a bit of a mystery to me. The two wee villages it runs to could have been served with an extension of the 44/X44 with a total requirement on one extra bus all day and perhaps some extra capacity at peaks.

I don't believe Lothian would have started a separate company with three all-day buses (plus one peak) to operate a not-very-commercial route if they did not have a hope or expectation of taking over the rest of First's East Lothian services in due course. I suspect FSE is a dead man walking.

Anonymous said...

Has Lothian actually set-up a new limited company with its own licence or is it just a (stand-alone?) division on one of the existing licences?

Anonymous said...

The registration is to an existing subsidiary Edinburgh Shuttle Ltd who for a time ran a minibus service linking the Airport to city centre hotels.

There may be commercial as well as brand reasons for keeping it at arms length from the main Lothian Buses.

Anonymous said...

A splendid article - enjoyable read.

It is debatable whether the frequency increases to 5 and 35 are much related to the First withdrawals. Probably more to do with encouraging travellers onto services that bypass Princes Street and the central area where tram work disruption continues.

35 for example would probably attract some passengers off the 44 from Slateford towards the city. And in the opposite direction, an alternative (although admittedly some way off equivalent) to the Airlink service.

Nothing stays the same in Edinburgh for any length of time, so expect to see further adjustments before the end of the year. Operational experience will surely prompt Lothian to send out unscheduled duplicates if passenger demand creates capacity problems and affects timekeeping.

Anonymous said...

The BIG talking point at the moment is Stagecoach is sniffing around Livingston depot.


Its not over until Souter sings :P

Anonymous said...

You thought Edinburgh was bad, feel free to have a look at Livingston, Larbert and the rest of what is left of FSE.

No positive investment has been made there. Passengers have to suffer with the scrap laid on by First and ridiculous fares.

Livingston barely has a few routes that break even, one of them being a route that they took on after an independent called it a day. You can see why First want that place gone.

Steven said...

An interesting development too has been the re-routing of service 47 to avoid the city centre; instead of running via the Bridges, it now runs via Lothian Road, Tollcross and Lauriston Place to rejoin the former route at Surgeons' Hall. It is apparently on an experimental basis and going by the tweets on Lothian's Twitter feed over the last few days, ti's proving popular with passengers.

Anonymous said...

It would be much better for all concerned if First just abandoned the areas that are never going to be sufficiently profitable for them.

Other operators would pick up the worthwhile routes, on emergency registrations, and the public would, at long last, have a bit of confidence that their local bus service would be safe(r).

: ) said...

"Its not over until Souter sings"

Or don't you mean

Its not over until Souter *signs*

: )

Anonymous said...

Souter doesn't have to sign, he just waits a while until First eventually realise that they have fairly worthless assets in some parts of the UK. Stagecoach, or others if he fears competition concerns in a particular area, will then just register some of the few lucrative routes.

Might be better to be sooner rather than later.

Anonymous said...

@1652 - so why buy North Devon then?

Anonymous said...

Because Stagecoach has already done so:

Anonymous said...

Not yet it hasn't.

Anonymous said...

Good balanced article. With regards frequency increases on services 5 & 35 we shouldn't loose sight of the fact that Lothian have to develop their own network regardless of what happened with First.

The reality was that laterly passenger numbers on Firsts 44 and 86 were very poor so only small tweaks to existing services were required. Increasing frequencies to match those that were withdrawn would have been commercial suicide at a time when the bus industry in Scotland is under extreme financial pressure.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 28 June, 2012 19:14 said...
"@1652 - so why buy North Devon then?"

Probably to get their hands on Coney Avenue depot. Now that the purchase is being investigated though, it might be that they would indeed have been better off just registering against the core routes and upping the anti on the 21 as if the CC finds against the purchase it more or less makes whole swathes of First operations (many of which they are/were presumably considering disposing of) unsaleable and pretty much worthless.

Anonymous said...

Quite - perhaps if First points out to the CC that the North Devon operation doesn't make their required returns and that the alternative to this sale is business closure and redundancy for the staff, then perhaps they might allow the takeover through. Interesting that the deal is subject to clearance....

Passenger Transport reports that a number of First operations, in the West Midlands, Northampton, Chester, Birkhenhead, Wigan and one part (one depot of the remaining two) of the 163 vehicle Somerset operation which has not been disclosed.

Anonymous said...

(adding to the above) are up for sale....

Anonymous said...

Re anon 00:31

Surely there's more than two depots in Somerset? Or are we just talking 'Southern National' rather than 'Badgerline' heriage?

Steven said...

First made two fatal errors in Edinburgh right at the start of the noughties. The first one was the scrapping of the Edinburgh Overground in April 2001, after just nine months, and the introduction of new services which culminated in the introduction of the ill-fated Edinburgh city network. The second one was the introduction of exact-fare coin vaults on services operated out of Dalkeith, Livingston, Musselburgh, North Berwick and Westfield. At a stroke, this removed First's main selling point, but also created confusion since First services into Edinburgh from the Borders, South Queensferry and Linlithgow continued to (and still do) give change. To the best of my knowledge, First Scotland East must be the only First company in the UK which use two different methods of fare collection on its commercial services.

After the Edinburgh bus war, it was the outlying depots which bore the brunt of the cuts, not least the Borders area which went from having four main depots and one outstation to one main depot (at Galashiels) and three outstations. Many long-standing First services in the area were given up, passing to other operators on retendering, while the fleet took on a decidedly unkempt and shabby appearance. Yet the Borders operations have been turned around in the last few years, with an injection of 24 new vehicles between 2003 and 2007 which included the area's first-ever brand new double-deckers for the 'main road' service 62. First has apparently also set its sights on winning back some of the services currently operated by Munro's. Despite its apparent remoteness from the rest of First Scotland East, the Borders area is proof that things can be done for the better if you let them get on with it, and whenever a vehicle is transferred from Galashiels to another depot the receiving depot returns compliments on the condition of the vehicle.

Sadly the same could not be said for the Edinburgh-area depots which have let things go to rack and ruin since the mid-noughties, with the closure of Dalkeith and downscaling of Musselburgh the inevitable sorry conclusion. A few years ago on a visit to Edinburgh Moir Lockhead noticed the front wheeltrims sported by Lothian's buses and ordered First to fit front wheeltrims throughout the fleet. I'm sure the long-suffering passengers of the Lothians would have much preferred a reliable service over buses fitted with front wheeltrims any day!

Anonymous said...

Re: anon 30/6 @ 0800
I meant Bridgwater and Taunton depots, Weston super Mare isn't in 'Somerset' and neither is Yeovil, which First run from Southampton and is now overseen by Weymouth.

Taunton is a large depot in comparison to Bridgwater, which whilst it is a newish depot specially constructed only has 21 buses and they could reasonably reallocate some of the work it does to Taunton, leaving around 10 buses. Yeovil is also out on a limb with work for 15 buses but that isn't in Somerset by First's definition.

Think the purchase of Cawlett was a defensive one to prevent other people coming in. A lot of coach and school work has been lost over the time, which built critical mass but perhaps is viewed as non-core.
Can't help but think Stagecoach would have much of it in their hands still had they took over....

Anonymous said...

Anon 00:38 - Taunton and Bridgwater only accounts for circa 80 buses, well short of the 150 (Busing's post 30/6) or 163 (Passenger Transport).

Anonymous said...

That's right, but the PT article mentions a part of the entire operation?